ClawRoutervsLynkr
Two self-hosted LiteLLM alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ClawRouter | Lynkr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 125 in AI | #59 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 6 640 | 639 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.12.301 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ClawRouter scores 66/100 against 48/100 for Lynkr, so it is the safer default.
ClawRouter ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Lynkr.
If you want the quickest setup, Lynkr is easier to run; ClawRouter needs more configuration.
ClawRouter is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
ClawRouter details →Lynkr details → All LiteLLM alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep ClawRouter, compare it with
Keep Lynkr, compare it with