# ClawRouter vs llms.py

> Two self-hosted [OpenRouter alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/openrouter), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ClawRouter | llms.py |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #23 of 125 in AI | #28 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 6 640 ✓ | 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.12.301 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.0.26 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ClawRouter scores 66/100 against 50/100 for llms.py, so it is the safer default.

ClawRouter ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for llms.py.

If you want the quickest setup, llms.py is easier to run; ClawRouter needs more configuration.

ClawRouter is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ClawRouter](https://selfhost.directory/project/clawrouter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clawrouter.md)
- [llms.py](https://selfhost.directory/project/llms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clawrouter-vs-llms