# clawmetry vs langflow

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | clawmetry | langflow |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #77 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 435 | 156 112 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.12.542 · 2 Jul 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

langflow scores 90/100 against 50/100 for clawmetry, so it is the safer default.

clawmetry ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.

If you want the quickest setup, clawmetry is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.

langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [clawmetry](https://selfhost.directory/project/clawmetry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clawmetry.md)
- [langflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/langflow.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/clawmetry-vs-langflow