clawbridgevsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clawbridge | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 44 in Dashboard | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.3 · 18 Mar 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 49/100 for clawbridge, so it is the safer default.
clawbridge ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, clawbridge is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
clawbridge details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep clawbridge, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with