# Claper vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Claper | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Elixir | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.

If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Claper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Claper](https://selfhost.directory/project/claper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/claper.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/claper-vs-windows-arm