ClapervsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Claper needs more configuration.
Claper details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with