Clapervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 114 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +3 520 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 520 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with