ClapervsApache SkyWalking
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | Apache SkyWalking | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #2 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 24 978 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v11.0.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache SkyWalking scores 76/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
Claper ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Apache SkyWalking.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; Apache SkyWalking needs more configuration.
Claper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →Apache SkyWalking details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep Apache SkyWalking, compare it with