Clapervsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 35 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 14 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →qdrant details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep qdrant, compare it with