ClapervsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Prysm scores 65/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
Claper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with