ClapervsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Claper | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 18 in Content Management | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 821 | 15 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 13 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
PeerTube scores 75/100 against 59/100 for Claper, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Claper.
If you want the quickest setup, Claper is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
PeerTube is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
Claper details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep Claper, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with