# Cinephage vs tubesync

> Two self-hosted [Sonarr alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/sonarr), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Cinephage | tubesync |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 60/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 142 in Media Management | #24 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 884 | 2 809 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.19.1 · 19 Sept 2026 | v0.18.5 · 8 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

tubesync scores 60/100 against 58/100 for Cinephage, so it is the safer default.

Cinephage ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for tubesync.

If you want the quickest setup, tubesync is easier to run; Cinephage needs more configuration.

Cinephage is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Cinephage](https://selfhost.directory/project/cinephage) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/cinephage.md)
- [tubesync](https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tubesync.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/cinephage-vs-tubesync