ChronoFramevsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame and ZeroNet score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; ZeroNet needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with