# ChronoFrame vs Yuxi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Yuxi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #44 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 7 543 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.2 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame and Yuxi score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Yuxi.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Yuxi needs more configuration.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Yuxi](https://selfhost.directory/project/yuxi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yuxi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-yuxi