# ChronoFrame vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-workout-cool