ChronoFramevsworklenz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | worklenz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame and worklenz score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
worklenz ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; worklenz needs more configuration.
worklenz is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →worklenz details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep worklenz, compare it with