ChronoFramevswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 18 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 163 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.853.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
windmill scores 77/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
windmill ships more often: 163 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.
windmill is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →windmill details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep windmill, compare it with