ChronoFramevsWiki.js
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 29 104 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +143 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Wiki.js scores 77/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Wiki.js ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
Wiki.js is growing faster right now (+143 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Wiki.js details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Wiki.js, compare it with