# ChronoFrame vs Whiteboard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Whiteboard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #5 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 380 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Whiteboard](https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-whiteboard-2