ChronoFramevsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 4 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with