ChronoFramevswhisper-asr-webservice
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | whisper-asr-webservice | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #3 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 367 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 9 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 62/100 for whisper-asr-webservice, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for whisper-asr-webservice.
ChronoFrame details →whisper-asr-webservice details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep whisper-asr-webservice, compare it with