# ChronoFrame vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 2 675 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-wbo