# ChronoFrame vs vito

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | vito |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 27 in Server Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 3 259 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 4.2.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

vito scores 64/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

vito ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [vito](https://selfhost.directory/project/vito) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vito.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-vito