ChronoFramevsvanilla-cookbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | vanilla-cookbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #13 of 18 in Recipe Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.6.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 46/100 for vanilla-cookbook, so it is the safer default.
vanilla-cookbook ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →vanilla-cookbook details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep vanilla-cookbook, compare it with