ChronoFramevsunsloth
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | unsloth | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 78 729 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 005 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
unsloth scores 85/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; unsloth needs more configuration.
unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 005 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →unsloth details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep unsloth, compare it with