# ChronoFrame vs umbrel

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | umbrel |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #9 of 22 in Home Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 434 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 52/100 for umbrel, so it is the safer default.

umbrel ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; umbrel needs more configuration.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [umbrel](https://selfhost.directory/project/umbrel) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umbrel.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-umbrel