# ChronoFrame vs uMap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | uMap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #3 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 1 628 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +25 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.8.1 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uMap scores 64/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

uMap ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; uMap needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [uMap](https://selfhost.directory/project/umap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-umap