ChronoFramevsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 56 870 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +141 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
Typst is growing faster right now (+141 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with