# ChronoFrame vs txtdot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | txtdot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.

txtdot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [txtdot](https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/txtdot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-txtdot