# ChronoFrame vs Twenty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Twenty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 21 in CRM |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 60 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +2 595 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | twenty/v2.52.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Twenty scores 84/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Twenty ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Twenty needs more configuration.

Twenty is growing faster right now (+2 595 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twenty.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-twenty