# ChronoFrame vs trypost

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | trypost |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 18 in Social Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 764 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.0.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 58/100 for trypost, so it is the safer default.

trypost ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; trypost needs more configuration.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [trypost](https://selfhost.directory/project/trypost) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trypost.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-trypost