# ChronoFrame vs ThinkDashboard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | ThinkDashboard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #32 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.6 · 24 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 45/100 for ThinkDashboard, so it is the safer default.

ThinkDashboard ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [ThinkDashboard](https://selfhost.directory/project/thinkdashboard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/thinkdashboard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-thinkdashboard