# ChronoFrame vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 47 727 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-text-generation-webui