ChronoFramevsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
ChronoFrame details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with