# ChronoFrame vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-swarm-cronjob