# ChronoFrame vs Suwayomi-Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Suwayomi-Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 4 in Manga Reader |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 7 962 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +217 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.2366 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Suwayomi-Server scores 71/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Suwayomi-Server ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Suwayomi-Server needs more configuration.

Suwayomi-Server is growing faster right now (+217 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Suwayomi-Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/suwayomi-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/suwayomi-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-suwayomi-server