# ChronoFrame vs Sonarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Sonarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 17 477 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +980 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Sonarr scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.

Sonarr is growing faster right now (+980 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Sonarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-sonarr