# ChronoFrame vs Snipe-IT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Snipe-IT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 15 in Asset Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 15 110 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +136 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v8.8.3 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Snipe-IT scores 77/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

Snipe-IT ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Snipe-IT needs more configuration.

Snipe-IT is growing faster right now (+136 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Snipe-IT](https://selfhost.directory/project/snipe-it) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/snipe-it.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-snipe-it