# ChronoFrame vs SimpleX Chat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | SimpleX Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 19 613 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +143 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0.4 · 3 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Haskell |

## Which one should you pick?

SimpleX Chat scores 74/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

SimpleX Chat ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; SimpleX Chat needs more configuration.

SimpleX Chat is growing faster right now (+143 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [SimpleX Chat](https://selfhost.directory/project/simplex-chat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/simplex-chat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-simplex-chat