# ChronoFrame vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 4 508 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

ChronoFrame and rudderstack score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-rudderstack