# ChronoFrame vs rsyslog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | rsyslog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 67/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 2 343 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

rsyslog scores 67/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.

ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [rsyslog](https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rsyslog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-rsyslog