ChronoFramevsRocket.Chat
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Rocket.Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 46 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +187 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 36 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Rocket.Chat scores 82/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Rocket.Chat needs more configuration.
Rocket.Chat is growing faster right now (+187 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Rocket.Chat details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Rocket.Chat, compare it with