ChronoFramevsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 25 217 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Rembg scores 78/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
Rembg is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with