ChronoFramevsProxmox Kubernetes Engine
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Proxmox Kubernetes Engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #10 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 244 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.0.7 · 13 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 41/100 for Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, so it is the safer default.
Proxmox Kubernetes Engine ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Proxmox Kubernetes Engine needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Proxmox Kubernetes Engine details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Proxmox Kubernetes Engine, compare it with