ChronoFramevsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 40 501 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +582 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3517 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3906.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PostHog scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3517 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
PostHog is growing faster right now (+582 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →PostHog details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep PostHog, compare it with