ChronoFramevsPlik
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Plik | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 1 829 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame and Plik score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Plik ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for ChronoFrame.
ChronoFrame is growing faster right now (+32 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Plik details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Plik, compare it with