# ChronoFrame vs Plausible Analytics

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Plausible Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 29 708 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +501 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.

Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+501 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-plausible-analytics