ChronoFramevsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 29 706 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +499 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.
Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+499 stars in 30 days).
ChronoFrame details →Plausible Analytics details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Plausible Analytics, compare it with