ChronoFramevsPinepods
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChronoFrame | Pinepods | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 18 in Podcasts |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 1 032 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +40 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | 0.9.0 · 26 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
ChronoFrame scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Pinepods, so it is the safer default.
ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Pinepods.
If you want the quickest setup, ChronoFrame is easier to run; Pinepods needs more configuration.
ChronoFrame details →Pinepods details →
Swap a project
Keep ChronoFrame, compare it with
Keep Pinepods, compare it with