# ChronoFrame vs Pinchflat

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ChronoFrame | Pinchflat |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 41 in Photo Management | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 964 | 5 430 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +32 | +62 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Pinchflat scores 65/100 against 63/100 for ChronoFrame, so it is the safer default.

ChronoFrame ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Pinchflat.

## Details

- [ChronoFrame](https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/chronoframe.md)
- [Pinchflat](https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pinchflat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/chronoframe-vs-pinchflat